Thread: "WANKING" moderated by Egalite

Starting this thread on Egalites favorite subject and I Hope for lots of great contributions! Lets start it out by mentioning that "Boots" the UK's largest drugstore chain has a big sale on scented Kleenex today!!! So if you want to bring in the New Year with a bang along with Egolite-----Here's your chance!!!!!

Geez Egolite you are starting to repeat your vulgar insults (you used that one already)...Try to be more creative if you could---Happy wanking tonight!!

I just knew that you would be the biggest contributer to this thread as its your favorite topic!!!! Carry on and try to an even bigger and better Wanker in 2012

What the hell is wrong with you 2??? Don't you guys have anything better to do except throw insults on a baccarat forum??? Fucking pathetic and I am sick of seeing this garbage posted. This site is for the discussion of baccarat you idiots.

totally agree with you but I don't know what to do? He repeatedly attacks me with bull s,,, accusations, and has threatened my life in private messages. I will defend myself and am trying to move the fight over here to the general discussion area under appropriate threads so members don't have to read this baloney in baccarat related threads

This place has really gone down the shitter lately. Too many idiots from across the pacific who think that if they wear green and chew on dried monkey penis while playing baccarat that they'll get 3 time lucky or some dumb ass shit like that. Clearly there are only just a few left here that actually understand the game, and fewer still that actually play and win....

Fairly Evident = I think so to Egolite,,, unless you have anything even close to proof lying wanker?

Oh and confused gambler welcome to egalites wanker world you should fit right in

Originally Posted by tomla

Oh and confused gambler welcome to egalites wanker world you should fit right in

I would rather wank off with Egalite then have anything to do with you. You are a complete waste of skin.

You should really keep that between yourselves! But its nice to know what you would rather be doing!!! good luck confused and happy wanking with Egolite I am sure you will be thrilled with the results.

To you two Happy 2012 Morris Albert - Fellings (Tribute to) - YouTube

I didnt bump that thread---someone else did---but it doesnt matter--good luck to you and confused!!!!!!!

I refer to LOTI as LOLI for a specific reason( he uses LOL like you and confused use KY Jelly), (I think half of his stuff is full of sh..) and 4 out of the 5 things he has tested in the last 6 months in this forum and roulette forums hasn't been tested by him but has been moved to IMSPIRIT..... (I can document this if you like?) , on one he passed the wrong progression to the real tester IMSPIRIT, On another he tested or more likely passed on the test to IMSPIRIT, he didnt use the progression that was part of the system and came up with conclusions. He didnt think that not using the progression is a problem because in his own words "if it doesnt work flat betting a progression will not help" or something to that effect....Another thing I tested came up different , like way different from LOLI stuff ...... So I think it is nice to warn people that his findings might be off!
Baccarat testing is way different then roulette : you have shuffles, end of shoe stuff etc---. I have a feeling LOLI doesnt factor this stuff in?
By giving silly opinions he may be throwing people off to real baccarat systems---
LOLI is sort of like Egolite: accusing me w not even a inkling.....
Happy New year to both and I am sure that Confused will volunteer to wank with you two

tomla, the queen of the run on sentences, proves two things.

1. He knows nothing.
2. Even inbreed hicks can get internet access.

I would like him to prove:

and 4 out of the 5 things he has tested in the last 6 months in this forum and roulette forums hasn't been tested by him but has been moved to IMSPIRIT..... (I can document this if you like?) ,

And:

Baccarat testing is way different then roulette : you have shuffles, end of shoe stuff etc---. I have a feeling LOLI doesnt factor this stuff in?

And:

By giving silly opinions he may be throwing people off to real baccarat systems---

The guy is obviously a poser and knows nothing about testing or it seems, gambling in general. I wouldn't trust the guy to test for dangerous fumes (although he should try anyway for obvious reasons) let alone test a baccarat system. The guy can barely form a coherent thought LOL

LOL , LOL , ,,,,,, I myself have gambled for years and won, and you dont gamble!!!!!

you seem very touchy about your abilities?

Originally Posted by tomla

LOL , LOL , ,,,,,, I myself have gambled for years and won, and you dont gamble!!!!!

Wrong again. I told you, I gamble with IQ every time I read one of your posts LOL

I doubt you gamble you at all. It sounds like you couldn't sit or stand still for long. You have the manic rantings of a child with Fetal alcohol syndrome or something.

Now prove that:

and 4 out of the 5 things he has tested in the last 6 months in this forum and roulette forums hasn't been tested by him but has been moved to IMSPIRIT..... (I can document this if you like?) ,

And:

Baccarat testing is way different then roulette : you have shuffles, end of shoe stuff etc---. I have a feeling LOLI doesnt factor this stuff in?

And:

By giving silly opinions he may be throwing people off to real baccarat systems---

I love how he puts questions marks after a statement:

(I can document this if you like?) ,
I have a feeling LOLI doesnt factor this stuff in?

LOL What an amateur.

I can work on these:
and 4 out of the 5 things he has tested in the last 6 months in this forum and roulette forums hasn't been tested by him but has been moved to IMSPIRIT..... (I can document this if you like?) ,

And:

Baccarat testing is way different then roulette : you have shuffles, end of shoe stuff etc---. I have a feeling LOLI doesnt factor this stuff in?



those two I can show, any other requests?

Originally Posted by tomla

I can work on these:
and 4 out of the 5 things he has tested in the last 6 months in this forum and roulette forums hasn't been tested by him but has been moved to IMSPIRIT..... (I can document this if you like?) ,

And:

Baccarat testing is way different then roulette : you have shuffles, end of shoe stuff etc---. I have a feeling LOLI doesnt factor this stuff in?



those two I can show, any other requests?

Then show it! Stop spouting your fetal alcoholic mouth and show some evidence for once you poser.

I will not show today unless its really important to you?

LOL

What a shocker! He makes statements and then says, well I won't prove it today.

tomla is dumb?

LOLI
You would put what after this?
I can document this if you like?

Do you know why great debaters always win? They already know the answer to every point that could possibly be made against their argument.

You see, I know that I have done my own testing. Imspirit confirms my findings sometimes, but if I say I have tested it, I have tested it. If I say I have HAD it tested, I have had it tested. See the difference?

With regards to end of shoe shuffles, tomla again seems to raving like a FAS baby. The Zumma copies I have only include the shoe number, decision in that shoe and outcome (Player or banker). So exactly how does shuffle have ANYTHING to do with it? If a system relies on shuffling, card values, then I use OTHER data WITH card values and shuffle information to test it.

It really is not that complicated for the average person. I guess a sub average person like tomla wouldn't understand?

number 1!
1
General Discussion / Re: Alabalah, CEH and Silversurfer

« on: November 17, 2011, 11:23:24 PM »
As far as this CEH, w3m scam scam nonsense goes...

Imspirit ran a test for me in the past year for baccarat. The formula goes if there are X (banker or player) hits in Y decisions (5-20 or something like that), then bet X for Z decisions (Z is 1-10 or something similar). He ran tens of thousands of iterations, if not more. Everything turns up negative eventually. Another programmer did the same thing for me for baccarat over a year ago AND I have tested this on the dozens in roulette when I was testing that Roul-Eight system. Everything turns negative eventually.

• Reply
• Quote
• Notify

Zumma shoes are not real and no one plays that way in real life!

Originally Posted by tomla

number 1!
1
General Discussion / Re: Alabalah, CEH and Silversurfer

« on: November 17, 2011, 11:23:24 PM »
As far as this CEH, w3m scam scam nonsense goes...

Imspirit ran a test for me in the past year for baccarat. The formula goes if there are X (banker or player) hits in Y decisions (5-20 or something like that), then bet X for Z decisions (Z is 1-10 or something similar). He ran tens of thousands of iterations, if not more. Everything turns up negative eventually. Another programmer did the same thing for me for baccarat over a year ago AND I have tested this on the dozens in roulette when I was testing that Roul-Eight system. Everything turns negative eventually.

• Reply
• Quote
• Notify

LOL. This is proof? I stated that Imspirit ran the test for baccarat, and I ran the test for dozens in roulette. LOL

Oh boy!

Originally Posted by tomla

Zumma shoes are not real and no one plays that way in real life!

Actually asshole, Zumma shoes ARE real, and Egalite also uses them to test. And Egalite sure as fuck has more baccarat experience than you LOL

If you think that someone sat there in the 70's from texas and counted (and the casino allowed them to sit and write) them your in a fog....egalite sleeps well when he loses,,,,, if you could prove that zumma shoes are real that would be fun!!!!
number 2.
..... , there is no guarantee it will ever catch up. Imspirit has tested coin flips and found that sometimes ......

2..... , there is no guarantee it will ever catch up. Imspirit has tested coin flips and found that sometimes ......