My Strategy++ Please comment

[fauzy]

You will get trauma if you lose 124=7 many times

124 is not the good way. forget it Bro.
square is good way but your MM124 is bad. changing to last decision no1no 2no6 no7 square bet last no 7(no1P2P6P7 betting B) unmatch
Ton of gamblers stopped using 124u=7u/137u=11u

[Nassty9]

yes you will get killed if you will lose alot row but you gotta factor in all the wins.. please write out your cards and see what i am saying.. you win more than you lose in my opinion

[oddsman]

After understanding your system in a more complete way, I like it even more and even as a 3 step betting series. Yes it's risky like any other marty series, but you got a good chance to hit it often. The squares do make a difference which I didn't see the first time. All systems are not 100% but some systems like this one improve your chances more in short term but maybe even long term.

[oddsman]

By the way you can make any 3 step Marty a 2 step by waiting for a virtual loss in the first step but be
warned that you may miss out on winning serieses that win in that first virtual step, so overall it makes you wait more and you may"wait enough" to get hit with that isolated losing series. So I can't really say what's better.

[Nassty9]

---

oddsman im glad you see how the squares can work I just want to give people another way to play..
I need some to run the numbers on the 3step Marty vs the 2step Marty..

Im on the way to the casino..

[fauzy]

By the way you can make any 3 step Marty a 2 step by waiting for a virtual loss in the first step but be
warned that you may miss out on winning serieses that win in that first virtual step, so overall it makes you wait more and you may"wait enough" to get hit with that isolated losing series. So I can't really say what's better.

I like 2 steps loss and then I bet step 3th
,so I can save 2 steps,1u2u
The simplify of marty 124 is the 3th Marty,I also using The 3th marty square . if match I bet unmatch,if unmatch I bet match.

[oddsman]

In summary I would say, it's a fresh look to for bet selection although lots of writing tracking. I think you winning 18 days in a row 4 hits a day is alot to do with just luck. And if you start this system and lets say win 10 and lose just 2 you be at -4. Hit and run will win often not always.
I'm not sure if NOT ignoring ties like you do helps or not.

I believe there other methods that win about the same rate with much less tracking or even not writhing at all.

[fauzy]

In summary I would say, it's a fresh look to for bet selection although lots of writing tracking. I think you winning 18 days in a row 4 hits a day is alot to do with just luck. And if you start this system and lets say win 10 and lose just 2 you be at -4. Hit and run will win often not always.
I'm not sure if NOT ignoring ties like you do helps or not.

I believe there other methods that win about the same rate with much less tracking or even not writhing at all.

1 6
2 7
3 8
4 9
5 10 set is random
why not ..
2 7
3 8
4 9
5 10
6 11 so only on the top square 2378,1267,square 1 bet no 7. square 2 no 8.(the 3th Marty)

[oddsman]

Fauzy, I'm not sure I know what you mean. Like 2 virtual losses and than betting the 3th step?
And the randomization you use I'm not sure what you getting at.