When things are going well, expect to win +20-+30 units (per shoe).
Marginal Shoe: > +50
Terrible Shoe: > +200
bbb
p
b
p
b
pp
bbbb
p
bbbbb
pp
b
p
bbbbbb
p
bbb
pp
b
pp
b
pp
bbb
pp
bb
pp
b
p
b
ppp
bb
p
bbb
pp
b
p
b
+466 units
When things are going well, expect to win +20-+30 units (per shoe).
Marginal Shoe: > +50
Terrible Shoe: > +200
bbb
p
b
p
b
pp
bbbb
p
bbbbb
pp
b
p
bbbbbb
p
bbb
pp
b
pp
b
pp
bbb
pp
bb
pp
b
p
b
ppp
bb
p
bbb
pp
b
p
b
+466 units
Last edited by sevenshooter; 07-12-2011 at 05:12 AM.
How about try this shoe?
B
P
P
B
B
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
P
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
B
P
P
P
P
B
P
P
P
B
B
P
P
P
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
P
P
P
P
B
P
P
P
P
For Zyyt's Shoe: +51 units
What bet selection & MM are you using ?Thanks
Another shoe for you to test. I got -45 units with my method.
B
P
P
P
B
B
P
B
B
B
B
P
P
P
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
P
P
B
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
P
P
P
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
PPBBPPBPBBBBPPBPBPBBPPPBPBBBPPPPBBPBBPPPBBBBPBPBBP BBBPPBPPPP
Nice to see another real player back here
Your second shoe, Zyyt, scores +28 with my system.
It beats all:
pbpbpbp
p bb p bb p bb p
pp bb pp bb pp
pp bbb pp bbb pp
ppp bbbb ppp bbbb ppp
wins on half of:
ppppppp or bbbbbbb
b ppp b ppp
This first one was an easy one for me and my 100% mechanical system +16 units with a high of 22 and a low of -15
P B P P P P P P P P B B B P B P P B B B P B P P P B B B P P P P B B P B P P P B P P P P B P P B P B P P P B B B P P P B B B B P P
Now this one was a loser and is one of the reasons I don't play this 100% mechanical system for real money. As a matter of fact, the last time I played for real money was June 2010 at the Southpoint in Vegas and I lost.
The below shoe gave me -33 and I quit at hand 36.
B B P P B P B B P B B P P P P B B P B B P P B P P P P B P B P P B B P B P P P P B B B B P P B P B B P P P B P P P B B P P B B P B B P B P B B B P P B B B
Last edited by EhtelGaeb; 07-12-2011 at 08:36 AM.
The 1st two shoes are my losing shoes. How about try it on my winning shoe? I got +17 units.
P
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
B
B
P
B
P
P
B
B
P
B
P
B
B
P
B
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
B
P
B
B
P
B
P
B
B
P
P
B
B
P
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
B
P
B
P
B
B
P
P
P
B
P
Ehtel Gaeb: First Shoe: +39 Second Shoe: +48
Thanks for the test. Your system is great. You can turn my losing shoes to winning and my winning shoe to better winning. Three cheers for you.
From the little red dot.
BB
P
B
P
B
P
B
P
B
P
BBB
P
B
PPPP
BB
P
BBB
P
BBB
P
B
PP
BBBB
PP
BBBB
PP
BBBBB
P
BBBB
PP
B
P
BB
P
B
PPPP
BBB
PP
BBB
PPPP
B
PP
CHERIOS!![]()
wow all +, Great system ,please post the lose one and I can guess the system,,,, 7 shooter !
hi there,
this is the shoe from betphoenix
BB
PP
BBB
P
BBB
P
B
PPP
BBB
P
BBB
P
B
P
BB
P
B
P
B
PP
BB
P
BBB
PP
B
PP
BB
P
B
P
B
PPP
BBB
PP
B
P
B
PPP
BBBB
PPP
B
PP
here is the second shoe;
BB
P
BBB
P
BBB
P
BB
PP
B
PPP
B
P
BB
P
BBB
P
BB
PPPPPPPPP
BBBBB
P
BBB
P
B
PPPPPP
BBBB
PP
B
P
B
PPPP
BB
PPPPP
please check it
TL
Have got to go for now, but Tuanle, I can already tell my system wins both of your shoes, too.
After going thru your way of betting, you will need a very big bank roll to play with this kind of system. It is not realistic. Even though, if you have such a big bank roll, you will hit the table limit and not allow to place your bet. No way to recover your losses. Anyway, good try.
7shooter, you have shown loss string (4 in a row) in the shoes people have post vertically (whilst wasting a lot of space) to patterns that are not this this little example you gave us.
B -1wins on half of:
ppppppp or bbbbbbb
b ppp b ppp
B -5
P -1
B -9
P -1
B -5
B -21
B -37
P -21
BBBBB -8, -24, -59, -84, -119 (some heavy betting there, did you bump into Izak at the tables by any chance? LOL)
How come?
Last edited by Egalite; 07-12-2011 at 01:16 PM. Reason: Decided to shoot from the hip
All he is doing is betting player. Betting up when he thinks player will streak,(after 2 players) and using a delayed steep progression after any 2 losing player wagers...or close to that. Good way to throw your money away.
Last edited by Free; 07-12-2011 at 02:06 PM.
Some even heavier bets, might give this a try on the .5c tablesB -1844 (1844 unit bet)
PPPP -644, +556, +557, +558
BBB +557, +556, +554
PP +556, +558
BBB +554, +550, +546
PPPP +554, +562, +563, +564
B +563
PP +564, +566![]()
LOL, at one point in Merpholos' shoe, the betting goes from -44, right to -644. And yeah, Free seems to be right.
Seven, there's gotta be more to this than that, right?![]()
Yes, that is correct. However, compared with a straight-up Martingale, we would be winning 500x more units. One unit could be $1, $2, $5: whatever you're comfortable with. Had we been using a single dollar base unit we would be up more than $1200 over just eight shoes.
??? Baccarat offers us unique advantages as a table game since we are permitted to bet right up to the table maximum in each seat. Two hands of $500 plus one of $200 is not unreasonable, is it? The shoe posted by Merpholos was quite atypical, yet we still managed to earn +566 units. You do have the option of cutting your progression short, you know, and using a ladder approach. What I had wanted to demonstrate was that this progression is far, far more powerful than the conventional Martingale: we are never chasing to win just one unit.
Bookmarks