The Maths behind "UnBal" bet selection

[punvit]

PUNVIT
ok give comment please

Fauzy, you should already know the results of using marty or grand marty.

[Egalite]

18p-19b what is the grouping?36 ?

Fauzy, you are not seeing the bigger picture......

You either use a lot of money to make a small amount of money, with the risk of losing a lot of money OR you can use a little bit of money to potentially make a lot of money, with the risk of losing a small of money, refer thread & post 38.

To answer your question, there are 2 sets of answers.

If you hit the situation 18p-19b the "binary answer" is 2^36 = 6,871,976,736 possible combinations and a 86.8% chance of the next result being Banker.

The other answer is 50/50. Unfortunately the second answer is correct, as the cards have no awareness of "Binary tables", "UnBal", pattern (s), trends or anything else you want to apply to the stream of prior random results.

[fauzy]

Thank you Punvit & Egalite
What is binary table
" bbbb pppb unbal " is this binary answer

[fauzy]

Example; for a 4 set grouping.

BBBB = unbal win
BBBP = unbal w
BBPB = unbalw
BBPP = bal Lose
BPBB = unbal w
BPBP = bal w
BPPB = bal w
BPPP = unbal w
PBBB = unbal w
PBBP = bal w
PBPB = bal w
PBPP = unbal L
PPBB = bal w
PPBP = unbal w
PPPB = unbal w
PPPP = unbal L 14w -3L/1u-2u =2steps 78.57%



Using groups of 6, the ratio is 44/20 or 68.8%
Using groups of 8, the ratio is 186/70 or 72.7%
Using groups of 10, the ratio is 772/252 or 75.4%
Using groups of 12, the ratio is 3172/924 or 77.4% **
Using groups of 14, the ratio is 12952/3432 or 79.1%
Using groups of 16, the ratio is 52666/12870 or 80.4% ~~
Using groups of 18, the ratio is 213524/48620 or 81.5%
Using groups of 20, the ratio is 863820/184756 or 82.4%
Using groups of 24, the ratio is 14073060/2704156 or 83.9%



Bal v's UnBal - one of the few bet selections were the continuity of something is clearly provable as unlikely.


[Edited and borrowed from RWCA]

égalité[/QUOTE]
Punvit give comment Please ,thank you

[fauzy]

Example; for a 4 set grouping.

BBBB = unbal win
BBBP = unbal w
BBPB = unbalw
BBPP = bal Lose
BPBB = unbal w
BPBP = bal w
BPPB = bal w
BPPP = unbal Lose
PBBB = unbal w
PBBP = bal w
PBPB = bal w
PBPP = unbal L
PPBB = bal w
PPBP = unbal w
PPPB = unbal w
PPPP = unbal L 14w -4L/1u-2u =2steps 71.42%



Using groups of 6, the ratio is 44/20 or 68.8%
Using groups of 8, the ratio is 186/70 or 72.7%
Using groups of 10, the ratio is 772/252 or 75.4%
Using groups of 12, the ratio is 3172/924 or 77.4% **
Using groups of 14, the ratio is 12952/3432 or 79.1%
Using groups of 16, the ratio is 52666/12870 or 80.4% ~~
Using groups of 18, the ratio is 213524/48620 or 81.5%
Using groups of 20, the ratio is 863820/184756 or 82.4%
Using groups of 24, the ratio is 14073060/2704156 or 83.9%



Bal v's UnBal - one of the few bet selections were the continuity of something is clearly provable as unlikely.


[Edited and borrowed from RWCA]

égalité

Punvit give comment Please ,thank you[/QUOTE]

[fauzy]

Example; for a 4 set grouping.

BBBB = unbal win
BBBP = unbal w
BBPB = unbalw
BBPP = bal Lose
BPBB = unbal w
BPBP = bal w
BPPB = bal w
BPPP = unbal w
PBBB = unbal w
PBBP = bal w
PBPB = bal w
PBPP = unbal L
PPBB = bal w
PPBP = unbal w
PPPB = unbal w
PPPP = unbal L 12w -4L/1u-2u =2steps =66.66%



Using groups of 6, the ratio is 44/20 or 68.8%
Using groups of 8, the ratio is 186/70 or 72.7%
Using groups of 10, the ratio is 772/252 or 75.4%
Using groups of 12, the ratio is 3172/924 or 77.4% **
Using groups of 14, the ratio is 12952/3432 or 79.1%
Using groups of 16, the ratio is 52666/12870 or 80.4% ~~
Using groups of 18, the ratio is 213524/48620 or 81.5%
Using groups of 20, the ratio is 863820/184756 or 82.4%
Using groups of 24, the ratio is 14073060/2704156 or 83.9%



Bal v's UnBal - one of the few bet selections were the continuity of something is clearly provable as unlikely.


[Edited and borrowed from RWCA]

égalité

Punvit give comment Please ,thank you[/QUOTE]

[punvit]

Punvit give comment Please ,thank you

Fauzy, you should ask Egalite since, he posted this system and started this thread.

I do not play this method or system.

[fauzy]

Fauzy, you should ask Egalite since, he posted this system and started this thread.

I do not play this method or system.

Thank you Punvit, I will do to
understand written English.

[fauzy]

[QUOTE=Egalite;40533]If you take a set of binary tables, you might notice over a given set of hands, their are more pathways for decisions "not to be equal (unbalanced)" than to be equal" (balanced).

Example; for a 4 set grouping.

BBBB = unbal
BBBP = unbal
BBPB = unbal
BBPP = bal
BPBB = unbal
BPBP = bal
BPPB = bal
BPPP = unbal

PBBB = unbal
PBBP = bal
PBPB = bal
PBPP = unbal
PPBB = bal
PPBP = unbal
PPPB = unbal
PPPP = unbal

The ratio is 5/3, this is simply not good enough.

Basically this works out at a 62.5% chance of not being balanced, again I emphasise it is not strong enough.

With the larger samples, the ratio improves.
How many step? Last step is 5050?
Using groups of 6, the ratio is 44/20 or 68.8%
Using groups of 8, the ratio is 186/70 or 72.7%
Using groups of 10, the ratio is 772/252 or 75.4%
Using groups of 12, the ratio is 3172/924 or 77.4% **
Using groups of 14, the ratio is 12952/3432 or 79.1%
Using groups of 16, the ratio is 52666/12870 or 80.4% ~~
Using groups of 18, the ratio is 213524/48620 or 81.5%
Using groups of 20, the ratio is 863820/184756 or 82.4%
Using groups of 24, the ratio is 14073060/2704156 or 83.9%

** This is were I step in at a minimum, this is also my fav' Roulette method when playing all 3 EC'.

~~ This is one of my current complimentary betting options.

If it all looks complicated or your thinking, "you do more waiting than betting", this really need not be the case. The UnBal option I usually monitor no matter what-else I may be doing.

No apologies if you were expecting some "show me when to bet methodology". Effort should never be a barrier in the pursuit of taking money from casinos

Bal v's UnBal - one of the few bet selections were the continuity of something is clearly provable as unlikely.


[Edited and borrowed from RWCA]

Hi égalité,
sorry I ask you again. I like your system than 8 patterns xxx 7sets win ,1set lose

[fauzy]

Egaelite
Finally yes I have played, 1st to 2, 1st to 3, 1st to 4, 1st to 5 etc etc,
what is it mean ?

[Egalite]

Egaelite
Finally yes I have played, 1st to 2, 1st to 3, 1st to 4, 1st to 5 etc etc,
what is it mean ?

I have played, 1st to 2, 1st to 3, 1st to 4, 1st to 5 etc (rolling UnBal).

You have to let this thread die a natural death. It is we the player applying a set of maths to an entity that has no awareness of what it is we are applying or hoping it adheres to, same applies to "BP" and a lot of other fauzy logic methods (excuse the pun).

Pattern Capturing is much better, even more so when combined with proven probability

[LoserNoMore]

People need to remember that the "long term" and the "short term" are too very different animals. What you might consider "long term," math would consider short term. These tables show all hands over the long term, but you are playing at one casino, at one point in time. Keep that in mind.

The roulette wheel or the baccarat board has no concept of balanced or unbalanced.

Be very careful with any strong negative progressions you are thinking of employing. I really don't think they are worth it. A lot risked for a small gain.

The opposite would be better. Up as you win. Find a good streak and profit. Still, be careful with that too.

I think you are best playing in the moment: what is the roulette wheel doing now? Do you see a pattern? What are the cards indicating in baccarat?

Best of luck to all.

[fauzy]

[/QUOTE]<br>pppp bppp ub<br>pppp bbpp ub<br>pppp bbbp ub<br>pppp bbpb ub<br>pppp bbbb bal<br><br>bbbb ....