Thread: The proof-thread of personal claims.

Just a concept for now. When i feel like it later today, i will be the first here (as always) to put out some reasonably-convincing stuff.

Probably some documentation of the two cases i represented in one court or another in the span of Apr 6-11, 2011, as commented on in a couple recent threads.

No doubt, few else will participate except the real trolls.

The first set of two shots was a human-rights claim against a doctor, so had to be especially-careful to block out his name. As usual, some care was made to block out my own moniker, etc.

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01172733PM.jpg

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01181144PM.jpg

The second of three, a civil suit. Not showing that name either, but not that important if someone were to figure it out. The latter two links are of the envelope containing the settlement-cheque which was received yesterday. ("Small potatoes".)

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...162733PM-1.jpg

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01115040PM.jpg

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01115028PM.jpg

Not the sort of cases taken on by most lawyers. But one more human-rights "thingie" against a surgeon, likely in a couple of months as those cases currently take about 10 to 11 months to come off in the province of Ontario. My end-record is actually pretty-good, but no one wins everytime, hence a few "hits" here and there... certainly won't miss a second of it.



UPDATE:

Originally Posted by Egalite

He is a troll let's not mince words here, he ventured State-Side met Ellis who invited him to play, but he was already broke at this stage, then had the gall to tell Ellis and co they played the shoe wrong, obviously forgetting how good his own action was. With $25 minimum tables in Canada and $230 legal awards (9 units), it is safe to presume he hasn't gambled since, rather has inflicted his bitterness everywhere he roams.

Hey there, johno, did you notice Michelle's name on that claim? Another aspect about me which i don't believe i ever brought up on any of these sites, but which YOU continue to bring up as "imaginary".

This claim was a private matter, the result of a seller clearly breaching a written contract; but which could have easily progressed to a higher court had it not settled with her precisely when it did. I guess you let others "walk over you", or don't know any better? Or that you can't win the bigger cases if you can't win a "small potatoes" one. (Probably cost it $2,000 in counselor's fees alone; while i prepared for nothing during one of my customary, long walks. The other case, above, was performed pro bono for a friend.)

And yes, i intentionally left some of the "blacked out" stuff as a bit of a puzzle. Sort of like an "Easter-egg hunt"... is the time of the season, lol.

Now on to my bet to johno which he didn't call. (I instructed him to Western Union the $1,ooo Cdn to Archer.)

Afterward, he called it a "bluff bet". It was a serious offer, of course, with only the deciding evidence on my part being a bluff, or not.

Now he claims something like i have to prove out all of his ten(?) aka's here. Well, my bet was that he-as-LOTI is johno, who once wrote in one of his E-star posts that he wouldn't mind an "extra cheque" for his efforts. Thing is, betting that LOTI is johno means that only johno could've accepted the bet. (Think about it. Betting that Mr X is johno makes the bet with only johno.) So the issue here is what i claimed that johno once wrote... something very-doable. Anyway, one could pusue this sort of thing indefinitely with johno, whoever he really is. But we can know WHAT he is, though.

Man you really got it bad for Johno. Does your insignificant other have to call you "Johno" just so you can achieve an erection?

How about a 100 000 dollar bet that I am not Johno? Or are you going to chicken out again?

Originally Posted by LuckoftheIrish

Man you really got it bad for Johno. Does your insignificant other have to call you "Johno" just so you can achieve an erection?

How about a 100 000 dollar bet that I am not Johno? Or are you going to chicken out again?

LOTI,

You should click the ignore list on whoever that you don't like to see or read his or her posts. We know who is contributing and who is not. "When a sick dog is barking at you, you should not bark back because if you do, it means that you are also sick." And I don't see you being sick here unfortunately, I see otherwise.

LOTI, thank you for all your work and quick actions in responding to any potential scams and you always stand ready to test all kinds of systems and let us know the results.

Originally Posted by garnabby

The first set of two shots was a human-rights claim against a doctor, so had to be especially-careful to block out his name. As usual, some care was made to block out my own moniker, etc.

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01172733PM.jpg

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01134010PM.jpg

The second of three, a civil suit. Not showing that name either, but not that important if someone were to figure it out. The latter two links are of the envelope containing the settlement-cheque which was received yesterday. ("Small potatoes".)

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...162733PM-1.jpg

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01115040PM.jpg

http://i568.photobucket.com/albums/s...01115028PM.jpg

Not the sort of cases taken on by most lawyers. But one more human-rights "thingie" against a surgeon, likely in a couple of months as those cases currently take about 10 to 11 months to come off in the province of Ontario. My end-record is actually pretty-good, but no one wins everytime, hence a few "hits" here and there... certainly won't miss a second of it.

So..How much money do you make slipping on floors in retail stores?
I remember you called me a JOHNO once..
Is that hippie rainbow man who flashes a JOHN 3:16 card on the telly during football field goal kicks JOHNO too?

Originally Posted by LuckoftheIrish

Man you really got it bad for Johno. Does your insignificant other have to call you "Johno" just so you can achieve an erection?

How about a 100 000 dollar bet that I am not Johno? Or are you going to chicken out again?

No, no, no, and no.

The whole point of THIS thread is for any serious and competent members to "substantiate" their removed baccarat-claims through some MINIMAL demonstration of aptitude/achievement and/or on-the-job experience. (In my eg above, legal cases ending with large specific-damages settlements usually involve some form or number of strict non-disclosure clauses... so as they say, "No way, Jose.")

Ie, no one here, or anywhere else, really believes you have $100,000 or anything worth that. Reminds me of your first post over at the GG, Gambler's Glen Message Boards : Baccarat Message Board : Streak's you dream about :-) . You've NOT come a long way, baby!

Originally Posted by fulltimebac

LOTI,

You should click the ignore list on whoever that you don't like to see or read his or her posts. We know who is contributing and who is not. "When a sick dog is barking at you, you should not bark back because if you do, it means that you are also sick." And I don't see you being sick here unfortunately, I see otherwise.

LOTI, thank you for all your work and quick actions in responding to any potential scams and you always stand ready to test all kinds of systems and let us know the results.

Then ignore me, if you can. I wonder if Mike has put in that "ignore but not" function yet... for the ones with a lot of imaginary friends to have to tell them which they can't.

What work is that, as most already know none of those systems work... all have been manually tried by players like Punvit, who "don't like computers", long ago. I guess then it's the re- working/selling of junk. (By "most" i mean considering the vast majority of "surfers" who detour these sorts of sites long as there're the johno's.)

Anyway, the thing that "struck me" when i saw your first post here, a couple(?) of weeks ago... another full-time, expert guy who's been doing it "forever" but had only one post. (Reminds me of OLD sillE's BacQueen who learned his systems in a week, went on to having played professionally for years before, and then to some clones of herself across these sites.)

Originally Posted by pitty1

So..How much money do you make slipping on floors in retail stores?
I remember you called me a JOHNO once..
Is that hippie rainbow man who flashes a JOHN 3:16 card on the telly during football field goal kicks JOHNO too?

Well now, this just gets easier and easier, and more fun to boot.

Just putting something real out. Why so afraid? Here's an idea, why don't "all" you guys go back to restart and waste another 5+ years at the GG? Won't change my life, one way or the other. Say, i guess this site is just too hard to resist the way it is.

One has to wonder why Garnabby is around here anyway? He adds ZERO to the discussion, and is clearly delusional. Does anybody else think I am Johno LOL

My goodness, talk about being off your rocker Garnabby.

Originally Posted by Egalite

But you fuck it up for others who want to discuss the game with your child like interjections. You can't afford to play the game, so you should shut the fuck up. " w/o your education", you can't be serious or extremely deluded, my DOG is more coherent than you, your education is clearly reflected by your grammar.

What adult posts his drivers license and other irrelevant personal information on a gambling sites expecting others to follow suit, just because you did, a child perhaps?. Wherever you thread, you will forever be the Forrest Gump. Too scared to venture inside a casino, so you vent your frustration disrupting as many threads as you possibly can, because it suits your view of gambling and the world in general, born an idiot and went backwards from there. As somebody recently stated, when you post, we all need subtitles, doesn't that tell you something, dip shit.

That's the beauty of these few good public sites, and the internet in general. No expectations; no leaders per se; no hidden agenda(s); and little importance put on "followings" and "attention".

Yet it's YOU who continue to bring these things up... nay, accuse me (and others) of. Well, i responded as best i could to your specific concerns of me; and must leave you to struggle with the above general ones on your own time.

I just try to do my best, so that at the least i know i'll have no regrets with my time spent here and on this project.

Originally Posted by Egalite

Your a screw-ball Mark, there are no other words for it. So it is a PROJECT? To take this board down to your negative view of the world, to ruin thread after thread year after year, to drive contributors either away from the board or into private social groups to get away from your incessant incoherent mumbo-jumbo sentences, where your paranoia has you believing everybody is JOHNO . You must have one pathetic boring life if all this is a productive use of your time.

Stop trying your best, nobody gives a fuck (if you need confirmation, check out your own daft site), the majority want you to FUCK OFF. Can't you get the message you dumb child like bastard.

Private groups, like the one Sam's in with you? Gosh, and all of 7 members? And how many of them are you, lol?

http://baccaratforums.com/t6865-post32182/#post32182

Originally Posted by IamSamRedman

ok ill settle this. what did i aleggedly email you about?

Too many Sam's to keep track of? Well, here it is, that email i had teased johno over a few months ago... did it exist or not.

___________________________________________

"One of your posts was deleted in error.

The posting in which the RouletteGuru wrote,

"Man, you are still discussing these old stuffs," you quoted that and replied,

"My god, you don't know how long i've waited for someone else to write that! Lol."

I apologize that that deletion. That one was in error. If you would repost that same comment in that thread, it will not be removed.

I think that after you have read some of the Johno history with me which I have posted you can see my plan in attempting to clean up the board. I first wanted to clean up a couple of Johno threads so that I could then apply the same rules to him in totally fair way. In all the years (going back at least six) I have never responded to Johno harshly or acted in any way retaliatory, but Johno has been literally obsessed with me (as he has become with you and a few others). He is a man who lives on rage, where I am a man who lives on calm, non confrontational logical communication. I have tried to explain in those threads to Johno where I think he got this deep seated grudge for me (the very few instances where we actually had some interaction), and I actually think that he had a contact with someone else that he thinks is me. For a long time on various boards he has accused as many as six or seven posters as being me (hard to believe, but true). One example was a poster on the baccaratforums.com (Grab the Gold) with whom you also had disagreement. They always protest.. and in the end information emerges showing that they are someone else (but, I'm not sure he is ever convinced). I am wondering if he didn't have some long time off-forum conversation with one of those mistaken identities and that is the source of his problem with me. I don't know. Strangely, he has quoted from my old dozenbettor and Rosco (from VIP) posts numerous times over the years and adopted many of the ideas I described into his own recommendations of play Very strange indeed.

But, back to the matter at hand. On the Gamblersglen board, my objective was to try to heal it. Johno is probably the primary instigator of the venom on the board. He hates every one... Spike, G8player, Garnabby and me. He is obsessive about insignificant posts and passing comments that someone makes and will repeat an old off-hand remark that someone made over and over as though that is what they stand for. Probably he has done more to destroy GG than any other.

Now the reason you saw Johno come out and attack be voraciously in that "What's going on here" thread where Glenmod was being accused of doing Johno's bidding is that Johno saw right through my plan and knew that the rules were getting ready to be applied to him (and he knew his days of thread destruction were over). Yes, the irony of ironies was that while G8player was giving his analysis, saying how he had it all figured out... that Johno was controlling the moderator... he had it backwards ( and Johno could see that in my response the G8player).

So, now the spewing... which is why I directed that all such silliness and spewing and name calling can be in the General Discussion forum and that we won't be having that now in our baccarat discussions, a technique which has been used successfully on other boards. Johno felt the heat (as the saying goes) and that's what caused him to lash out so much there revealing that he was the long time attacker of me (although in my posting I had kept his name anonymous).

So, if you would repost that... comment as first described, it won't be removed (that one was deleted in error).

I actually think that if Johno's posts are removed as he attacks people in future threads (what I plan to do it to create a topic in the General Discussion forum and paste in all deleted posts so that it is apparent why they were, it will establish that childish attacks can be done... but just need to be in there and not in the Baccarat area.

Let me know if you have any ideas about how to restore the board to being a good discussion forum again.


Glenmod (sam)"
___________________________________

Maybe that's why the Gamblers Glen gave up on YOU, too much "rage" going nowhere? Now that's a good way to wreck also other things, like personal relationships. Don't you agree?

Should've called your group, "Real stories from the real johno (with a bunch of real friends here and there)... REALLY".

My guess would be that garnabby has some kind of schizophrenic disorder. He has probably been isolated for a long period, and consequently has never developed, or lost, the ability to communicate effectively.

The giveaway is that he makes no attempt to order his random thought processes in a coherent form: he can't understand that other people can't hear him think. You get this with drunks, tramps and the mentally ill. They just ramble madly, only making sense to the voice in their head.

We should probably just ignore him, as much for his own sake as anything else. This can't be good for him.

Originally Posted by GBV

The giveaway is that he makes no attempt to order his random thought processes in a coherent form: he can't understand that other people can't hear him think.

And this makes sense? (It does though, if you read GBV's and johno's stuff, especially of one complimenting the other.)

Originally Posted by GBV

We should probably just ignore him, as much for his own sake as anything else. This can't be good for him.

Nor can no book-sales.

Perhaps you think i'm hearing your thoughts now... that you have to ignore me by continually confronting me? That would be the true schizoid sign, right?

Gotta love this site, such a "collection".

Garnabby is not the "problem" that you guys are making him out to be. He is a man of intelligence, and his posts are, at least, civil.

That's more than can be said of Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster......it's impossible to keep track of all of his monikers......who, whenever HE sees it fit, posts whatever he pleases, truth and civility be damned. A crude and deceitful man; I can only suppose that's exactly why he NEEDS those multiple monikers.

So try not to be so hard on Garnabby. Better to try to understand him. His posts can get, admittedly, rather "rambling" and a bit difficult to decipher, but I simply can't paint him with that broad brush as delusional. He's is difficult to understand, but that doesn't make him delusional. He's wrong about LOTI being Johno, but that doesn't make him delusional. It simply makes him wrong about that. (In fact, it's rather tough to fault someone for thinking like that, when Johno has just so many aliases.)

And he's usually civil. No bashing. No cursing. He can make his points, whether you agree with them or not, without disgusting you. I can't say that for ALOT of posters in this Forum. ALOT.

I enjoyed GG very much. But, when Johno was given "free reign" to post, pretty much, whatever he wanted; lies, inappropriate language, senseless bashing.....that's when the Glen just wasn't "worth it" for me any longer. I refused to get brought down to that "basement level", and that's exactly what happens when you entertain those "baloney posters", as the Glen did, unfortunately.

There's nothing wrong with Garnabby that can't be found, and worse (MUCH WORSE), in so many more posters in this Forum. Try looking within yourselves. (And let's not pretend like we don't know who I'm referrring to.)

Originally Posted by Egalite

His MO will now have him wadding through everything you have posted and then nit picking through it to discredit you.

What have i wrote that you haven't either directly or indirectly ask of me by continually trying to discredit me. You say everything i write of is "imaginary"; and go on to make up completely-ridiculous trash about me.

What's wrong, your "medicine" not going down so well here either? Why would i even bother with the old "Carlo down the johno" thread stuff which you had someone at the GG delete for you. You just keep doing it to yourself.

This a topic I posted elsewhere, dedicated to GR8, obviously not the brightest bulb in the box if he thinks garnabby is intelligent. Not disputing he has been helpful explaining his take of the 25 Stepper progression. However it comes as no surprise that with all his baloney regarding variance, which is to complex for us mere morals to grasp, that he shuns meeting anybody in AC, has never once posted a single shoe. He can certainly spew out he sale manta's shoulda/woulda/coulda, "I own this game", but that should come as no surprise, as he is a salesman, a sharp tongue does not mean you have a keen mind.

A simple appreciation of psychology and you can see right through the bull.


From my many years at the tables, it is fairly obvious that people have their personal comfort zone when it comes to actual bet value or unit value.

I’ve never seen a low roller comfortable with starting at betting blacks or pinks. I’ve seen high rollers become low rollers for obvious reasons and then become accustomed to betting at that level. I’ve seen low rollers dabble at being a high roller due to some windfall or compo payout and they later revert back to being a low roller the following week.

This is not meant as a slight, by any means on low rollers of the board, I have started out betting the table min many times. I even recall the most prominent poster on this forum comment about comfort zone. The comfort Zone exists in us all, it is a psychology barrier.

Let’s look at it another way, something the “careful” bettors amongst us can equate to or visualise. Say you’re a player that usually plays the table minimum in conjunction with a slight negative progression.

Imagine you have been given $5000 to gamble with. In most cases what would you do? It is my belief that most would bet the same unit value, however would make the bet with a lot of confidence, or perhaps their usual starting value x2. If you are use to betting $5 or $10’s while using a negative progression, not many would start out betting $50 or $100 units. Making a bet of 5 x $100, feels a lot different than making a bet of 5 x $10, even if you do have the backup bankroll.

You may even play your normal game albeit more aggressively, or perhaps take your negative progression further. From what I have seen and speaking from personal experience, if you have extra cash, you don’t suddenly double or triple everything. Most would save the extra for reserve, you have a different psychology having bought in for a few hundred knowing you have another 4.8K in your back pocket. Not many would buy in for a few thou’ straight away.

I have mentioned on a few occasions how I won a lot of money using a very aggressive Fibonacci, and lost when I doubled my unit value because I wouldn’t take the new revised unit value to the same depth. I was out of my comfort zone to place that amount of money on the flip of some cards. Even though I had placed bigger bets prior to this.

We all have our comfort zone, could be based on sensibility, bankroll availability, risk or simply due to too many prior losses. Once you have it, it can be difficult psychologically to step beyond it. It is my opinion you would have to had won a lot of money or being winning consistently before doubling everything up, never mind increasing 4 or 20 fold.

Now look at it from another angle, the High Roller. Those that are comfortable betting black or stacks of Pink, i.e. some of the Chinese I mingle with “often”, think absolutely nothing of throwing a table min chip on the table when they don’t fancy a bet. They think nothing of it, win or lose, if they win, will double it up, again don’t care what the outcome is.

Would a $200 bettor act the same? From what I have seen, YES, no need to sit out so many hands, because you have a high comfort zone, therefore betting the table minimum is insignificant. Which then leads me to the question, why would it matter if the High Roller went 1-2-3 or 1-1-3, for the sake of the cost of a unit? The answer is, it wouldn’t.

If the High Roller wanted to save themselves the cost of a unit, and I do fail to see why, wouldn’t it make more sense to say drop to playing $100 units rather than 200 units. Of course he may just like using a 1-1-3 progression.

Or just maybe they wouldn’t use expressions such as this.


From: ****** ******* (name removed, author GR8)
To: Jon Anon
Subject: Re: Baccarat
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:32:18 -0700 (PDT)

<snip>

Yet, I find myself winning many first bets, so the "push" at bet #2 is not
really hurting me. Wouldn't you agree, John, that if you have a decent bet
selection that doesn't (generally) fall into long losing streaks, that
something like a 1-1-3 might be best to handle it without "going nuts"
with a marty.

<snip>

“hurting me”??? High Rollers don’t usually hurt over the cost of one unit. They can afford it, otherwise wouldn’t be playing at that level.

I will repeat what I stated above, in my many years at the tables, I have yet to meet any low roller become comfortable with playing the high roller. I’ve seen low rollers make big bets, but that is not the same thing.

The purpose of this post, is not to pick on the little guy, we have all played the little guy at one time or other. Nor does it matter what anybodies betting value is, I really don’t care, it’s none of my business, there is no competition.

However and you can choose to agree to disagree, if you believe that “the comfort zone” exists for us all. How is it be possible for a former $10 bettor suddenly move their comfort zone to betting $200 units. You would have to agree, it’s highly unlikely, or that they where never betting $10 unit in the first place.

Face it stepping up from $10 to $200 units is not going to happen. Even stepping up from $10 to $100, ain’t likely either. Maybe $10 to $20 or $25 units after proven success.

As I have mentioned elsewhere, when I realised that somebody could get that excited in making those few units at that value (search the archives for GR8’s first appearance on the board) , I ceased my communication, as I soon realised somebody must have either a warped sense of humour or a few screws loose. Having played with a fair number of old timers, I made my mind up, what I was dealing with.

However the following should provide the obvious clue.

John, thanks again for your input, for it is always appreciated. As to
your question regarding the loss of 5 units (1-1-3), I generally wait for
10 units down, then increase my betting unit. If down another 10 units,
I'll increase again. Never got worse than that, as yet, both in my testing
and my actual play. The "jury is still out" on this, though, because you
can NEVER test enough to know for CERTAIN. Here's hoping!


If somebody is 10 units down, then proposes to increase their betting value and is willing to increase it yet again. First off do the maths, 10 x ?? = ?? unknown value and that is only stage one.

You repeat the same YET AGAIN, 10 x ?? = ??, do the (possible) maths. You could say that is one hell of a draw down, if you where starting off playing even $25 dollar units. I think it’s safe to assume the starting unit wasn’t $50, 100 and definitely not $200.

People change, well I subscribe to people changing their bet selection, however changing their unit size, via an 20 fold increase in the space of two years, well talk about moving one’s comfort zone and we are not talking about just for one session.

However, after the above email, I posed the question regarding unit value. The answer which came back was $10, while this is fine and acceptable given the 3 layered MM approach, no problem with that. Hang on a minute, this guy starts with a $10 base, (fine) but shouts from the rafters that he only makes 3 or 4 units profit per session, like he has hit the jackpot. I choose not to reply further and couldn’t understand how somebody could get that excited over making 3 or 4 units per session.


This may give you a better understanding, if you are intelligent enough, but I don't care either way, I'm about to head to the casino.

Thank you, Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster, et al. For you've just re-iterated the same lies, the very same baloney, the same phoney e-mails (that, for some reason, upon all you just re-hashed from your lies from the Glen, you somehow didn't mention or post above....yes, check the archives at the Glen, he ADMITTEDLY "doctored" (read: altered) a supposed-email from me, all in the name of discrediting me.

(I have never utilized $10 units. I've been betting "black" for over 25 years! If you know anything about AC, you'll know you can't even find a $10 game if you wanted one. Also, if any of you ever read the Trip Reports that I used to post at the Glen, you'll know that I make very few units, as I am a conservative player....does it make sense to any of you that I would work my 9 to 5 job, then rent a car, then take a 3 hr drive to AC, then play almost all night, then get up on Fri and play again, then the 3 hr drive home, then get up at 6:30 a.m. on Saturday to run a mgr's meeting at work at 8 a.m......ALL FOR $40!!!!!....ooops, wait, that wouldn't even pay the rental, tolls, and gas....ALL TO LOSE MONEY!!!!!)

Of course not. But why would all of that matter to Johno/Carlo/Egalite/
Scambuster et al? Why let THE TRUTH get in the way bashing someone? Just so long as he can "lower me" so he can then "stand on my shoulders".

You see, my friends, if you know anything about our time at the Glen, and, frankly, it's even carried over here into this Forum; Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster carries a venom for me that is truly immeasurable, and will spare no expense (certainly not THE TRUTH) to discredit me.

Well, my friends, I didn't go for it at the Glen and I will not go for it here.

Have at it, Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster, et al. Do your thing, as only you can. Bash and lie your way to the top. Maybe, just maybe, you WILL get to stand on my shoulders.

BUUUUT, know this, Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster et al: EVERYONE KNOWS THAT YOU'RE BOTH A LIAR AND LOWLIFE, AND YOU WILL NEVER GET ANY REAL RESPECT HERE.

Okay, i guess GBV didn't "get the rest of what i was thinking specially for him", lol, so i'll have to try to tell him again in a way that doesn't involve terms like "isolated non-linear count-values".

Randomness doesn't in any way equate with madness. That's a commom mistake. But i hope he's not one to ride further in that vein with something like, "It's all physics and math." That would be a more-serious issue for our new-found resident "man of science".

And thanks for the "value-added" slur(s) on the disabled. Not even Savant was this much "fun".

This thread has become boring, hopefully it will soon fade.

Okay, here we go again.

johno deleting stuff, this time conveniently after gr8player's exit.
_________________________

johno wrote:

---Quote (Originally by gr8player)---
Thank you, Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster, et al. For you've just re-iterated the same lies, the very same baloney, the same phoney e-mails (that, for some reason, upon all you just re-hashed from your lies from the Glen, you somehow didn't mention or post above....yes, check the archives at the Glen, he ADMITTEDLY "doctored" (read: altered) a supposed-email from me, all in the name of discrediting me.

(I have never utilized $10 units. I've been betting "black" for over 25 years! If you know anything about AC, you'll know you can't even find a $10 game if you wanted one. Also, if any of you ever read the Trip Reports that I used to post at the Glen, you'll know that I make very few units, as I am a conservative player....does it make sense to any of you that I would work my 9 to 5 job, then rent a car, then take a 3 hr drive to AC, then play almost all night, then get up on Fri and play again, then the 3 hr drive home, then get up at 6:30 a.m. on Saturday to run a mgr's meeting at work at 8 a.m......ALL FOR $40!!!!!....ooops, wait, that wouldn't even pay the rental, tolls, and gas....ALL TO LOSE MONEY!!!!!)

Of course not. But why would all of that matter to Johno/Carlo/Egalite/
Scambuster et al? Why let THE TRUTH get in the way bashing someone? Just so long as he can "lower me" so he can then "stand on my shoulders".

You see, my friends, if you know anything about our time at the Glen, and, frankly, it's even carried over here into this Forum; Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster carries a venom for me that is truly immeasurable, and will spare no expense (certainly not THE TRUTH) to discredit me.

Well, my friends, I didn't go for it at the Glen and I will not go for it here.

Have at it, Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster, et al. Do your thing, as only you can. Bash and lie your way to the top. Maybe, just maybe, you WILL get to stand on my shoulders.

BUUUUT, know this, Johno/Carlo/Egalite/Scambuster et al: EVERYONE KNOWS THAT YOU'RE BOTH A LIAR AND LOWLIFE, AND YOU WILL NEVER GET ANY REAL RESPECT HERE.
---End Quote---


Hey Robert I'm frying bigger fish at the moment, so I really don't have time for this. Suffice to say, you were over the moon with your 4 units wins over at GG many years back, I knew people that actually read your posts and wondered how somebody could get that excited over making such a small amount. In your defence I stated, nobody know ho big his units are. Then I posed the question when we were exchanging emails. You clearly stated your betting amount was $10. I realised then I was dealing with a fruitcake and subsequently deleted the email. People can make up their own minds regarding the emails that are not doctored above. For the record, in all my time inside casino's and VIP room, I've never seen a High Roller sweat on the cost of ONE UNIT.

You annoyed me so much at the Glen, yes I doctored an email, I have owned up to it since. People that know me personally and hopefully those I invite elsewhere will testify I am as honest and genuine as they come, alas it is for people to make up their own minds, I can't convince people otherwise, they will draw their own conclusions given time.

As for your expenses, not worth my time speech. It was Nathan Detroit that pointed this out in the first place, not you. You simply reasoned it was a good counter argument and have used it since. For somebody to come to this forum and state in their first post "they only tell the truth", well it must raise eyebrows. I have offered to fly to AC and meet you in person share a game or two, you turn me down with endless excuses, you won't meet anybody else either. The reason being you don't want the Walter Mitty myth exposed.

As I say, I've bigger fish to fry in my local casino and I'm done with it, enjoy the fantasy you try so hard to paint, I'm pretty sure you have hooked Garnabby, maybe you can teach him how to play for six months and not lose a session, share the secret code you use to outfox the casinos, more of your long tales from the Glen.
__________________________


"... yes I doctored an email, I have owned up to it since. People that know me personally and hopefully those I invite elsewhere will testify I am as honest and genuine as they come, alas it is for people to make up their own minds, I can't convince people otherwise, they will draw their own conclusions given time."

Note the above part, it segues nicely into my reply to another of your meaningless rants which trolls another thread, gr8player's progression. (Beginning to wonder why Mike puts up with it, thought he was trying to limit the nonsense here lately.)

Originally Posted by Egalite

Why don't you re-login as LordMuffDive and tell us how he met Robert, used Garnabby's 50,000 marker and bet $5000 per hand.

That's an easy one... Lord wrote at length in fluent french, liked GrabTheGold, and dropped out abruptly (for some time) when Gold left in "a huff".

What's the difference between yourself, loti, and the other "mouths" who have all on occasion wrote in the same fluent potty-mouth directed at Michelle and myself?

From the "Countdown to Vegas" thread,

Originally Posted by Egalite

Who cares what you think. You haven't played since Christ knows when, yet claims can obtain a marker of $50,000 in any casino (your just as bad as your mat8). Or did you forget that post you made on Gamblersglen. If there is any crap going on, you can be sure Garnabby is involved somewhere, somehow, just how you like it.

Nice guy, that johno. He's the only person who matters, lol.

Look, johno, you would have just re-posted my, or any other, original comment on that topic, or any other, from the GG... if you didn't "need to" and weren't going to "doctor" it up, right? But gotta like how the simplest of comments from others just keep growing into something completely-different through you.

If we took the collective stupidity of every low-life imbecile known since the evolution of man, it might be close to the complete lack of brain function you possess. You're a schizophrenic who thrives on creating diversion. If it wasn't for the child like games Mark, I wouldn't have posted what I did and simply left him living in his fantasy world. Robert should have had more sense and stayed out of it. I think most people now realise they ruined a perfect rectum when they put teeth in your mouth!

Mark you're a schizo idiot why don't you beg Robert to show you the code he uses to fool the casino that enabled him to play for six months solid and not suffer a losing session, or maybe tell us all "once again" about this $50,000 marker you claim can obtain from any casino. You are one load mankind wishes your mother had swallowed.

Lol

Originally Posted by LuckoftheIrish

Lol

Well, ask for a sentence...

Do you walk around looking for broken paving stones, if a car is to close jerk the park brake? You sure sound like a real knob.

Originally Posted by Egalite

Originally Posted by garnabby

No doubt, few else will participate except the real trolls.

.

Originally Posted by Egalite

Why not post more of your personal business on a gambling site, like a good naive limp wristed nervy unsure child.

Maybe he can take a picture of a pile of money again LOL

Man Egalite, I never knew how sick this guy was. I wish I had listened to you years ago.

The skitso didn't claim to have the ability of a 50k marker, it was only 25k

What "game" are you playing (by yourself), johno?

My standard buy-in at mini-bac is $5000, with signature-access to $25,000 (at the table).

I don't issue dares, esp'ly to persons such as yourself who can not even show proof of a driver's licence.

But nothing's stopping you (or myself) from simultaneously posting say 100 monetary bills of your country's highest denomination... overlapped so that the (different) serial numbers exposed.

It's your turn, right? (However were i you, i would first want to look into the legalities of doing so on line in your country, given eg, all the new anti-terrorism laws. LOL.)

P.S. Maybe your new-found "pal" Ellis will lend you his "pot to p*ss in" so we'll still have our Carlo down the johno?

Teorulte,

Just as long as (also) the casino's do some "crying", eh?

[Edited by GARNABBY on 16-Jan-10 15:00]

Greeeeeat. Now you all teamed up and got garnabby banned.


Soooo... now what????

It might be good for him to have a "vacation", and come back fresh.

Why if you all got him banned and he gets all fired up and in response takes over the baccarat tables in Vegas causing a third of the casinos to close down, it is the fault of all of you to incite such wrath.

In that case, Donald Trump would be the next "President".