Therapy101: Daily Shoes

[Therapy101]

Well, it seems I'm guilty of sloppy record keeping/posting. There are two

shoes in April I posted twice. The dates in question are in red on the

"Calendar". They will be replaced shortly. I apologize for the errror. This

was a losing shoe. Sub -4, Major -1.

2 attachments

T101

[joshky]

A 5 star rating only has to show how much we appreciate your sharing here, T101. Wishing you well as always.

[Therapy101]

A 5 star rating only has to show how much we appreciate your sharing here, T101. Wishing you well as always.

Oh! I'm so surprised. Thought it was for my "Comedy Central". lol Thanks

Joshky.

T101

[Therapy101]

Not sure why, but these shorter shoes seem to be troublesome.

2 attachments

T101

[500]

Wow wow wow!!
So much data!!
Thanks for these!~
By the way, i love your jokes attachments as well!!
the first one seems to have gotten me pretty good. (the airport taxi)

anyways,
thanks again!
I hope you do well!

[Therapy101]

Finally a win from Snoqualmie. I'll take the four.

2 attachments

T101

[500]

Just out of curiosity, these results are all from live casino right?

thanks in advance

[Therapy101]

Just out of curiosity, these results are all from live casino right?

thanks in advance

Yes my friend, these are from Live Casinos. T101

[Therapy101]

Nasty Shoe. Something about these shorter Snoqualmie shoes.

3 attachments

T101

[fulltimebac]

Nasty Shoe. Something about these shorter Snoqualmie shoes.

3 attachments

T101

Therapy 101,

You cracked me up on these jokes!!! What a story to read and I really find it funny.

Well, keep up on your daily report and attaching more jokes. LOL

This reminds me of a husband and wife last night at the baccarat table. The husband was holding a bottle of beer each time I saw him and his wife sat at the table and played. He rarely played baccarat as he only let his wife played it.

Each time the wife started to make a bet, he yelled out the next decision, if the wife bet banker, he yelled out "player" and vice versa. The whole table was laughing at him and the poor wife lost a lot of money. Maybe it is a revenge of some sort? LOL

[Therapy101]

These Snoqualmie Shoes, can't seem to win them. Anyone else have

issues with these shoes?

2 attachments

T101

[500]

These Snoqualmie Shoes, can't seem to win them. Anyone else have

issues with these shoes?

2 attachments

T101

Tell you the truth, I got huge problems with majority of them.
I asked you before if they were live casino results cause these results you post looked like online casino results. Problem with these shoes for me is that theres too much spikes. Too much of this, then too much of that which ends up mathamaticaly correct. Doesnt happened too much in casino with my system. And I understand sh*t happens all the time, but this is a little weird.

QQ

FiveHunDred

[Therapy101]

Tell you the truth, I got huge problems with majority of them.
I asked you before if they were live casino results cause these results you post looked like online casino results. Problem with these shoes for me is that theres too much spikes. Too much of this, then too much of that which ends up mathamaticaly correct. Doesnt happened too much in casino with my system. And I understand sh*t happens all the time, but this is a little weird.

QQ

FiveHunDred

I can assure you these cards are from B&M Casinos as stated. Interesting

you can distinguish between RNG and B&M. Cheers T101

[natural9]

if i gave you 100 decisions from a B and M casino and 100 from online casino you would not be able to tell the difference

[ADulay]

I can assure you these cards are from B&M Casinos as stated. Interesting you can distinguish between RNG and B&M. Cheers T101

Before this gets started up again, let's make sure we distinguish between...
1. B&M casino.
2. LIVE dealt online casino.
3. RNG online casino.

Big difference in the last two, of course.

AD

[Therapy101]

Before this gets started up again, let's make sure we distinguish between...
1. B&M casino.
2. LIVE dealt online casino.
3. RNG online casino.

Big difference in the last two, of course.

AD

Don't see how there can be any confusion as the name of the Casino plus the address is

included with the shoe. T101

[fulltimebac]

These Snoqualmie Shoes, can't seem to win them. Anyone else have

issues with these shoes?

2 attachments

T101

THERAPY101,

You cannot tell whether your system loses or wins unless you have played a full length of each shoe. It seems that lately, you have incomplete shoes and again this will not tell you whether it is a winner or loser. IMO.

[Therapy101]

THERAPY101,

You cannot tell whether your system loses or wins unless you have played a full length of each shoe. It seems that lately, you have incomplete shoes and again this will not tell you whether it is a winner or loser. IMO.

If you had read all my post's you would know that the shoes from Snoqualmie must be six decks or less. The data was entered directly from the scorecards. T101

[fulltimebac]

If you had read all my post's you would know that the shoes from Snoqualmie must be six decks or less. The data was entered directly from the scorecards. T101

I did read your post. I think it was an incomplete shoe though. SNO has eight deck cards not six's.

Being that said, I would only post the complete shoes. Just my opinion. I think you possess the winning system though.

Fulltimebac

[Therapy101]

I did read your post. I think it was an incomplete shoe though. SNO has eight deck cards not six's.

Being that said, I would only post the complete shoes. Just my opinion. I think you possess the winning system though.

Fulltimebac

I do seem to remember at least one shoe I posted was not a full shoe. Although never having been there, I just assumed there were only six decks. After recording the shoes on my computer, I burned them so cannot confirm.

You seem to know about Snoqualmie, are you in Washington? If so, what's

the Casino like?

[fulltimebac]

I do seem to remember at least one shoe I posted was not a full shoe. Although never having been there, I just assumed there were only six decks. After recording the shoes on my computer, I burned them so cannot confirm.

You seem to know about Snoqualmie, are you in Washington? If so, what's

the Casino like?

It opened its door in in November of 08 and I have played there almost every day in 08, 09 and part of 2010. I have not been there since mid 2010 because I decided to play somewhere else. I play regularly now at Tulalip casino.

The SNO is not bad. I think with the down economy along with more small non indian casinos available, larger B&M casinos lost a lot of customers mainly to say baccarat customers as they go to play somewhere else.

Good luck with your trip, T101!

[thidrum]

Hi!
a recent strategy i thought up of to produce 1-2 units (generally 3-4 units are ok but 1-2 i feel are much safer) win per shoe has done it in all the shoes posted here. would be grateful if u could provide a big database to check this strategy.
thanx

[Therapy101]

Thank God, this is the last of the Snoqualmie Shoes. Treated me decent

this time. Oh, my apologies to our Lawyer friends. LOL

2 attachments

T101

[Therapy101]

I've never played this Casino. This 1st shoe from Macau is probably not a

full shoe. I'll take the wins. Sub Strategy saved the shoe for me.

2 attachments

T101

[Therapy101]

This shoe seems to be short as well, but again was profitable. This will be

the last shoe posted until I return from Vegas. Cheers to all.

2 attachments

T101

[eirescott]

I've added the screenshot of my hand scored sheets of your difficult Snoqualmie shoes.

I counted 7 shoes - #6 seems missing - and I counted an average of 65 hands per shoe for a total of 390 hands over the 7 shoes.

I scored 50 units total minus the carry-overs I had [these are typical when running a "continuous shoe"] for a gross total of 43 units.

Scott

[Therapy101]

I'll add to this the screenshot of my hand scored sheets of your difficult Snoqualmie shoes.

I counted 7 shoes - #6 seems missing - and I counted an average of 65 hands per shoe for a total of 390 hands over the 7 shoes.

I scored 50 units total minus the carry-overs I had [these are typical when running a "continuous shoe"] for a gross total of 43 units.

Scott

Those totals seem to be in the ballpark Scotty. Congratulations. Not sure I

will continue with the Daily Shoe. I was planning to have many scorecards

from Vegas. But, alas, I have none. Not too many members have interest

in RNG results. T101

[500]

Nooooo....
well that sucks.
I was looking forwards to it. :/