Flat Betting Eirescotts BP System

[fauzy]

Eirescotts: I have a system that was passed on to me. It was used on Craps, but can be used on Baccarat as well. This old timer used it in the 60's. He passed away and it in turn was given to me. I have his original sheets that he used to make his play which he used sucessfully for over 4 years. I was told that he had 100 dollar bills behiind book cases and the stems of leg chairs hidden in his apartment. If you or anyone you know that does any kind of programing we may have another approach to winning at Baccarat. You can e-mail me at elgarlv@cox.net......................Sal.

Yes I agree.It is good for charity.$ talks everywhere,I hate free......free love ,free sex,free market.

[soxfan]

Hmm, I wonder what happened to beammeupscotty? maybe he got abducted by aliens, hey hey.

[hannah]

this seems like a lot of work just to get nowhere fast. can someone correct me if i'm wrong?

[Egalite]

this seems like a lot of work just to get nowhere fast. can someone correct me if i'm wrong?

BB
PB
BP < bet B after B to match 1st set and subsequently lose the bet
P < bet B after P to match 2nd set, because a match is more likely than 4 different, or even B against the left hand column, if playing both columns.

Sounds a decent concept? However what level of awareness do the cards have of the prior 7 results they have produced? Answer ZILCH. What awareness do the cards have of "the Birthday Paradox" syndrome? Zilch. Same applies to a lot of methods, UnBal v's Bal, and the many SO variations being prime examples.

Great feeling when they work, but they work because they just do, which has nothing to do with conformity with a method you are trying to apply to an entity which has no understanding of what you are applying. The flip side then leaves you feeling baffled when such methods fail.

When you hit two losing grids and having lost either six or eight bets, your mindset then tells you silly things such as, "I'm now due a win", or "there is no way I'm going to hit three losing eight hand grids". What you need to realise, is the cards have no idea what they have produced, they are just spewing out random decisions, they have no awareness that in the last two sets of eight decisions there hasn't been a single so called match.


For the record - I played it, I won a fair few sessions playing it, then I was astonished I lost with it, after all it's suppose to be based on Maths. Then I had the epiphany, what awareness do the cards have of conforming to such expectation or what they have previously produced. Answer Zilch. Playing DBL via columns (also a crock of shit) will lose less than this, this can be proven by a set of binary tables.

[PantyPlan]

Great!!