Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Some more USEFUL stats/tools... .

  1. #1
    garnabby is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
    Age
    50
    Posts
    800

    Default Some more USEFUL stats/tools... .

    ---
    Last edited by garnabby; 06-01-2011 at 02:58 AM.

  2. #2
    Plasia is offline BaccaratForums Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    58

    Default Re: Some more USEFUL stats/tools... .

    Garnabby. If I'm reading this right, basically you are saying that given a stop-win of 1 and no stop-loss you will succeed around 9/10 times.

    Say I stop at 1 for 9 shoes in a row.

    I am now +9 all up (not including commission)

    On the 10th shoe I lose a huge amount (for example: more than 9) and thus I lose overall. Is that what you are saying?

  3. #3
    ADulay is offline BaccaratForums Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    64
    Posts
    699
    Favorite Casino
    BetPhoenix

    Default Re: Some more USEFUL stats/tools... .

    Plasia,

    What Garn is attempting to explain, in his own simple words (and a tad of mathematical obsfucation), is why some people from BTC, who "claim" to have won 15 or 19 or 20 shoes in a row, most probably did it by winning 1 unit and calling it a winning shoe.

    Of course his premis is all wrong, as is his motive, but what he appears to be trying is to tell everyone that only by making 1 unit could you possibly run 20 shoes in a row as winners.

    I'd would beg to differ, but then I'd be on the losing side of any argument with "The Appointed One" as anything I would say on the matter would be total lies.

    The best I could come up with was 19 out of 20. I can assure the G man that it was more than 1 unit per shoe.

    As I now tend to just ignore G's message posts, he'll have to talk to you or himself about it.

    AD

  4. #4
    Archer is offline BaccaratForums Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,227

    Default Re: Some more USEFUL stats/tools... .

    Quote Originally Posted by garnabby View Post
    Yes, playing by a system w/o any statistical basis, on average you will lose the amount bet X the house-edge on each game.

    And incidentally, over many games and hence plays of the same bet-money, the house's edge will be compounded... until it only seems as though that edge must have been higher, to have reduced one's session-BR by so much more, perhaps by cheating, etc. (Another concept which Ellis "doesn't get".)

    Beyond that, these sorts of calculations are/will be useful in maximizing the benefits of any logically-progressing and grounded-to-begin-with systems.
    The operative words here are "statistical basis." Of course G is absolutely correct. Particularly he is correct about the compounded house edge making the edge "seem" higher. In terms of a single finite bankroll one might see that the house edge is 100%!

    The above is not to say that a player can go an awful long time picking spots and winning. An awful long time.

    It also assumes random trials but that is another thread.

    A

Similar Threads

  1. Some Zumma Stats
    By LuckoftheIrish in forum Baccarat Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 03:58 AM
  2. stats that replaces 113
    By senlung in forum Baccarat Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-28-2010, 08:44 PM
  3. Some baccarat stats
    By LuckoftheIrish in forum Shooting the Breeze
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 07-26-2010, 08:48 PM
  4. Betting against a RUN!? (With Zumma stats)
    By John in forum Baccarat Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-17-2010, 08:09 AM
  5. 4 Column Occurance Stats for Ellis
    By John in forum Shooting the Breeze
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-23-2010, 07:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •