Thread: Minimal Progression

I've saved it as a pdf for reference, get it here.

http://www.plasia.crosswebdesigns.ne...rogression.pdf

Basically this is a minimal progression I came up with. The progression is this:
Step 1: 1
Step 2: 1.5
Step 3: 2.5
Step 4: 4.5

You can use this progression as long as you can easily make an additional half unit bet. For instance on a $10 table this would be easy, 2 $5 chips for step 1, 3 $5 chips for step 2. However with a $25 table you may find it difficult to make a $37.5 bet In this situation you could use $30 as your base.

If someone else already came up with this progression then great! Please link me to it, I haven't seen it yet and I did do a search before I posted here.

I would personally stop at step 3 to limit my losing streak. However this progression could be extended if you desire.

I make no claim that this progression is a work of genius. I am sharing it so that it may be analysed by those who are good at analysis. Please comment on the progression not on the person

---

I'd like to fill in this little section here based on the insights of feedback.

Strengths of this Progression:
Betting amounts are smaller than other progressions

Weaknesses of this Progression:
You only gain +0.5 units after step 1.

Originally Posted by Plasia

Please comment on the progression not on the person .

Plasia,

I think you mean the unjustified/unexplained comments on the person/profession.

And if you want to keep it about just baccarat, then you, yourself, must (at some point) start out with only that.

P.S. Don't worry, a thread's "survival" is all the comment necessary.




John,

Would be helpful to at least provide a link to the systems/methods which you mentioned above, and some actual explainations... we're not all "GG-veterans" of the game.

And the "put downs" are never helpful.

hey John, I mostly looked through and searched this forum. I was unable to find anything like this progression. It may have eluded me and in this case, a simple link would clear everything up.

I do not understand the problem with my fibonacci, could you explain further?