| | | Shooting the Breeze This is where the action is for all people interested in anything baccarat related. Anything goes, seriously. Come meet and network with your peers, it's a fun way to take a break out of your busy day. |  | 
11-13-2009, 05:38 PM
| | BaccaratForums Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: USA
Posts: 12
| | EZ Baccarat Lawsuit - Talisman Group vs DEQ Systemes I always find these casino lawsuits interesting. A card game that is so old yet lawsuits about one company allegedly stealing another company's idea on a baccarat game. But hey, I'm no lawyer so I don't know the details, maybe trademarks/copyrights are involved? Here's the news report:
A lawsuit has been filed in a dispute between two companies involved in selling baccarat systems to casinos.
Attorneys for the Talisman Group LLC of Las Vegas filed suit Friday in federal court in Las Vegas against DEQ Systemes Corp. of Quebec, Canada; and subsidiary DEQ-USA Inc. of Las Vegas.
Talisman asserts in its suit it owns a method of playing baccarat that "eliminates the payment of commission" aspect of the game. This has been described as a method of speeding up play.
Talisman says it adopted and has been using the EZ Baccarat and Dragon 7 trademarks in connection with the game. The Dragon 7 system involves a side bet.
DEQ-USA owns a U.S. patent claiming a method of playing baccarat that also eliminates the payment of commission, the suit says.
Talisman says that in 2006, it agreed with DEQ-USA to jointly market EZ Baccarat and split the profits.
The suit charges that without Talisman's knowledge or approval, DEQ Systemes filed trademark applications for registration of the EZ Baccarat mark in various jurisdictions including the United States and Canada.
The suit says DEQ Systemes also has filed trademark applications to register the Dragon 7 mark in various jurisdictions, including Macau.
Talisman says it has demanded the defendants "take remedial action" concerning the card game system.
"Although defendants acknowledged Talisman’s rights in the EZ Baccarat and Dragon 7 marks and agreed to take remedial action, they have failed to do so. Instead, defendants are seeking to hold the EZ Baccarat marks hostage to extract concessions from Talisman," the suit charges.
The suit claims the defendants have attempted to register the EZ Baccarat word and design marks "by false or fraudulent declarations or representations or by false means" and asserts claims of unfair competition.
The suit, filed by attorneys with the Las Vegas office of Lewis and Roca LLP, seeks a judgment that Talisman owns the EZ Baccarat and Dragon 7 trademarks worldwide; and unspecified damages.
An attorney for the defendants declined to comment on the allegations Tuesday, saying settlement talks were under way.
"The parties are currently in amicable discussions to resolve the dispute," Las Vegas attorney Steve Gibson said.
DEQ, which also sells table game bonusing, jackpot and loyalty products, has said in promoting EZ Baccarat that it's equipped with "EZ Trak," an LCD-based hand-tracking system.
"The EZ Baccarat methodology and the Dragon 7 bet were co-created by Robin Powell and TJ Tejeda of the Talisman Group in conjunction with DEQ," DEQ has said in promoting the products. | 
11-21-2009, 12:15 PM
| | BaccaratForums Member | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada Age: 49
Posts: 714
| | Re: EZ Baccarat Lawsuit - Talisman Group vs DEQ Systemes Quote:
Originally Posted by samjohnson I always find these casino lawsuits interesting. A card game that is so old yet lawsuits about one company allegedly stealing another company's idea on a baccarat game. But hey, I'm no lawyer so I don't know the details, maybe trademarks/copyrights are involved? Here's the news report:
A lawsuit has been filed in a dispute between two companies involved in selling baccarat systems to casinos.
Attorneys for the Talisman Group LLC of Las Vegas filed suit Friday in federal court in Las Vegas against DEQ Systemes Corp. of Quebec, Canada; and subsidiary DEQ-USA Inc. of Las Vegas.
Talisman asserts in its suit it owns a method of playing baccarat that "eliminates the payment of commission" aspect of the game. This has been described as a method of speeding up play.
Talisman says it adopted and has been using the EZ Baccarat and Dragon 7 trademarks in connection with the game. The Dragon 7 system involves a side bet.
DEQ-USA owns a U.S. patent claiming a method of playing baccarat that also eliminates the payment of commission, the suit says.
Talisman says that in 2006, it agreed with DEQ-USA to jointly market EZ Baccarat and split the profits.
The suit charges that without Talisman's knowledge or approval, DEQ Systemes filed trademark applications for registration of the EZ Baccarat mark in various jurisdictions including the United States and Canada.
The suit says DEQ Systemes also has filed trademark applications to register the Dragon 7 mark in various jurisdictions, including Macau.
Talisman says it has demanded the defendants "take remedial action" concerning the card game system.
"Although defendants acknowledged Talisman’s rights in the EZ Baccarat and Dragon 7 marks and agreed to take remedial action, they have failed to do so. Instead, defendants are seeking to hold the EZ Baccarat marks hostage to extract concessions from Talisman," the suit charges.
The suit claims the defendants have attempted to register the EZ Baccarat word and design marks "by false or fraudulent declarations or representations or by false means" and asserts claims of unfair competition.
The suit, filed by attorneys with the Las Vegas office of Lewis and Roca LLP, seeks a judgment that Talisman owns the EZ Baccarat and Dragon 7 trademarks worldwide; and unspecified damages.
An attorney for the defendants declined to comment on the allegations Tuesday, saying settlement talks were under way.
"The parties are currently in amicable discussions to resolve the dispute," Las Vegas attorney Steve Gibson said.
DEQ, which also sells table game bonusing, jackpot and loyalty products, has said in promoting EZ Baccarat that it's equipped with "EZ Trak," an LCD-based hand-tracking system.
"The EZ Baccarat methodology and the Dragon 7 bet were co-created by Robin Powell and TJ Tejeda of the Talisman Group in conjunction with DEQ," DEQ has said in promoting the products. | Hi Sam,
A few more things about EZ-Baccarat:
1. Math: The chance of the banker 3-card seven push-on-a-win is from http://www.ezbaccarat.com/ at 0.0225 (Under the math section). Therefore the expected number of such games a shoe is 0.0225338 X 80 = 1.802704. That makes sense wrt baccarat in general because in a regular $5 game: 0.0117% (HE for on banker, not considering ties,) X $5 X 72 (non-tie decisions) = $4.21 comm... slightly more than the (1.802704 - the one approx additional banker win a shoe) X $5 = $4. Furthermore, EZ-baccarat has the same house-edge for the player-bet, and a slightly lesser one for the banker-bet. 2. I have read somewhere that most casinos which adopted a no-commission game have slightly changed the side-bets scoring conditions (for a push) to get around the royalty fees, and the lesser edge over the banker-bet. 3. Unlike the version of baccarat which pays half the banker-bet on a banker win by a six (see the thread Unlimited negative progression for more about that version), this one may be better attacked by simple card-counting... say when there are more 8, 9, and 0's, than usual, because there will be somewhat fewer 3-card 7's for either the player or banker -options.
Last edited by garnabby; 11-22-2009 at 09:58 AM.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM. |