Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0
Re: What if....
My take is, those cards are locked in the shoe and do not know what side has the most money bet on it. Your method doesn't sound logical to me.

07-12-2009, 01:08
PM #4 (permalink) giselle knowles
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0 

Re: What if....
thanks for your reply Clifton, I dont bet every hand and i make a chart of the table average win and loss over time, when people get frustrated by a few losses they get emotional and this is when there at there most vulnerable so when this happens and my chart indicates ill make a bet or two..
there are a few tell tale signs as to how a table is going by the amount of float chips, most of the time the float is full and the mood of the table,winning tables are noisy and loosing tables are quiet all this info helps me make the right bets at the right time.
Ive noticed there are certain patterns to peoples betting and i think there could be a system developed based on it but thats a topic for another day !!

07-12-2009, 06:59 AM #3 (permalink) aegis21

Re: What if....
Quote:
Originally Posted by E. Clifton Davis
Yes, It's not new. And yes, your logic is sound. It puts the avg. 26% casino table take on your side. The big pitfall is when the whole table, or most of it, gets on a run. You can go broke quickly. Therefore, you need a what if rule to your what if system that says something like: Bet against the table EXCEPT when the table is following a run. Now you've got something worth pursuing!
The exception rule bet against the table except when the table is following a run after a six in a row, er maybe a 5 in a row,er maybe a 4 in a row or maybe a 3 in a row, oh and maybe a 3 zig zag, or after a four zig zag or five zig zag.
How about when the table jumps on the terrible twos? Should we bet with them after the first two, second two, third two? When to stop? If you continue you will always lose the last bet. And since you started late (you are betting against the table until you hit your exception rule) you have lost at least two more bets than the table did on any of those what if's.
It still comes down to making the correct decisions, whether you are following the anti table method, or any other method.
There are on average 18 singles in an eight deck shoe, do you bet all singles will stay single or do you bet they will go to two? How do you make that decision? If you can make that decision correct more often than not, you should be able to make the next decision, how many of the 9 twos will stay two and how many will go to three. This is an extremely easy game if you make the correct decision!
LOL
__________________
-----------------------
John

07-12-2009, 05:20 AM #2 (permalink) E. Clifton Davis
Professional Player | Co-Founder

Re: What if....
Yes, It's not new. And yes, your logic is sound. It puts the avg. 26% casino table take on your side. The big pitfall is when the whole table, or most of it, gets on a run. You can go broke quickly. Therefore, you need a what if rule to your what if system that says something like: Bet against the table EXCEPT when the table is following a run. Now you've got something worth pursuing!
__________________
BeatTheCasino
ellis@beatthecasino.com

07-12-2009, 02:37 AM #1 (permalink) giselle knowles
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 64
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0 
What if..
Im trying a new approach to the game and thats betting opposite whatever has the most money on it either banker or player, the reason im doing this is because the casinos get rich by people loosing right, im interested to know if this way of betting has been done before...
Bookmarks