Thread: 3 + Capping/Neural System

So, being an active member in many forums, I came across this system in a craps forum and am posting it here!

Many of the 'craps' players call Baccarat their "catch-up" game, which doesn't make sense to me lol. Why not just play Baccarat in the first place?

Anyway, here it is:

3 + Capping

What we are looking for is 3 or more 'p' or 'b' in a row and then looking for a 'cap'.

p
p
p
B <---a run of 3 or more 'p's capped by a 'b'
Now we bet 'min' that another 'b' will show.
B <---$10 bet win!

Simple right? Hmmmm....not really, and of course you know why. That's when the Neural Progression begins. Many of the 'craps' players will not go above the 5th loss in a progression. Some gamble with the 'gambler's ruin' to 7 or 8. This is definetly a personal decision and depends on your bankroll. But from what they have said from numerous live and simulated shoes, this progression works.

So here it is:

p
p
p
B <---'p' run capped, so we bet 'B' will repeat
p <---$10 bet loss--begin Neural progression
p <---$15 bet loss
p <---$25 bet loss
p <---$40 bet loss
( Now as you can see the Neural progression is about adding up the total of the last 2 bets and then betting, to get 'even', but here's where the 3 + capping returns. )

B <---$65 bet win FINALLY!! Wait we are still down $25?
B <---$40 bet win--+$15 ( When winning the last Neural bet, drop down to the previous bet, that the 'B' will repeat. )

Now for some reason many players swear by this system, I have not tried it live, but on simulated shoes, and it works if you have the bankroll and the 'nuts', to bet. Like I said before this is a personal choice of how far you want to take the Neural progression, and on the simulated shoes the most back to back losses in one of those shoes, was 7.

Good Luck everyone, hope this might help some of you out!!

Couple of questions :

1. Do you use the same technique if you get 3 B's in a row instead of 3 P's
( your example starts off with 3 P's )?

2. If you win the $ 40 bet, do you start over at $ 10 or the previous bet of
$ 25 ? Seems like you said you start over with $ 25 which could really increase the progression amount.

Thanx

This is the system that actually got me into baccarat. I came across this system probably on the very same craps forum. I soon found out that this system is decent but sometimes risky. If you don't mind risking a lot of money with the progression then I guess it will be worth it, it just depends on your playing style.

I contacted the person who created this system because I had some questions about it. This was his reply.

"STOP GAMBLING !!!..... The 3-Capping does jade the odds back to the player....but.... sometimes it loses."

Not exactly what I was looking for so I changed it a bit and played a different version of the 3+capping which is probably no better then his version.

He did seem to have good success with it. I think it really depends on how much you are wiling to depend on the progression and your bankroll.

It's a decent system and I give him credit for having success with it but I just can't handle the progression.

This is my first post, but i've been gambling for many years. This system is the fibonacci sequence, we keep adding the previous two numbers to establish our next bet - the trick is to reduce the wager as quickly as possible after a win.

I your example you should have went back two steps not one. After winning $65 you need to bet $25.

Of course if you have an equal number of wins and losses one step up and one step down is more profitable, if you have a huge bankroll you only need to win 40% of the time to show a profit.

This system is applied more often to wagers that pay 2-1 ie. dozens on roulette. It is played with no regression after a win in this case.